<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New bus route along 16th Ave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/new-bus-route-along-16th-ave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/new-bus-route-along-16th-ave/</link>
	<description>The trials and tribulations of public transit in BC's Lower Mainland.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PublicCitizen</title>
		<link>http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/new-bus-route-along-16th-ave/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>PublicCitizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I live on West 16th and am dismayed that some of my neighbours are trying to keep the neighbourhood a bus-free zone. According to them, West 16th is a kind of bucolic oasis that&#039;s about to be destroyed by the advent of buses.  But in fact it&#039;s already a major thoroughfare for car traffic. I&#039;m not prepared to join with those who object to buses while blithely accepting an ever increasing volume of cars. 

At the same time, I&#039;m angry with Translink for reneging on their promise to restore trolleys to Cambie. I&#039;d like to see the trolley service restored on Cambie and maybe extended to the proposed route along West 16th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I live on West 16th and am dismayed that some of my neighbours are trying to keep the neighbourhood a bus-free zone. According to them, West 16th is a kind of bucolic oasis that&#8217;s about to be destroyed by the advent of buses.  But in fact it&#8217;s already a major thoroughfare for car traffic. I&#8217;m not prepared to join with those who object to buses while blithely accepting an ever increasing volume of cars. </p>
<p>At the same time, I&#8217;m angry with Translink for reneging on their promise to restore trolleys to Cambie. I&#8217;d like to see the trolley service restored on Cambie and maybe extended to the proposed route along West 16th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Romeogolf</title>
		<link>http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/new-bus-route-along-16th-ave/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Romeogolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-12</guid>
		<description>The new buses are quiet and don&#039;t rattle windows, unlike the older &quot;whistling wagons.&#039; Ignore the navel-gazing NIMBYs. The less SOVs we have on the road, the better. Still, rush hour bus service on the existing routes could be much more efficient. For one, I think inside-lane HOV lanes make more sense. There should also be bus conductors or loading attendants to make sure people don&#039;t glom around doorways, get to the back of the bus, take their packs off, don&#039;t take up more than one seat, don&#039;t bring food &amp; drink onboard, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new buses are quiet and don&#8217;t rattle windows, unlike the older &#8220;whistling wagons.&#8217; Ignore the navel-gazing NIMBYs. The less SOVs we have on the road, the better. Still, rush hour bus service on the existing routes could be much more efficient. For one, I think inside-lane HOV lanes make more sense. There should also be bus conductors or loading attendants to make sure people don&#8217;t glom around doorways, get to the back of the bus, take their packs off, don&#8217;t take up more than one seat, don&#8217;t bring food &amp; drink onboard, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/new-bus-route-along-16th-ave/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-11</guid>
		<description>The Save 16th nutters (my crazy neighbours who don&#039;t want me to have a nice bus ride to work in the morning - argh!) are having a public meeting this Wednesday, June 25.

Please come out and tell the &quot;Translink and City of Vancouver representatives&quot; that we are actually pretty stoked about a new bus route.

Wednesday, June 25th, 7:00pm
Canadian Memorial Church, 1825 West 16th Avenue (16th and Burrard)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Save 16th nutters (my crazy neighbours who don&#8217;t want me to have a nice bus ride to work in the morning &#8211; argh!) are having a public meeting this Wednesday, June 25.</p>
<p>Please come out and tell the &#8220;Translink and City of Vancouver representatives&#8221; that we are actually pretty stoked about a new bus route.</p>
<p>Wednesday, June 25th, 7:00pm<br />
Canadian Memorial Church, 1825 West 16th Avenue (16th and Burrard)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gvtt</title>
		<link>http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/new-bus-route-along-16th-ave/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>gvtt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 19:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-10</guid>
		<description>My bad. You are correct and I have amended the post. I should have done more research before attributing the site to Dunbar residents, rather than opting for a catchy blog headline! It&#039;s our intention to provide accurate news and informed commentary.

Thank you for letting us know the outcome of the message posted to the DRA Neighbours list serv.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My bad. You are correct and I have amended the post. I should have done more research before attributing the site to Dunbar residents, rather than opting for a catchy blog headline! It&#8217;s our intention to provide accurate news and informed commentary.</p>
<p>Thank you for letting us know the outcome of the message posted to the DRA Neighbours list serv.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dunbar Webmaster</title>
		<link>http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/2008/06/19/new-bus-route-along-16th-ave/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Dunbar Webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 08:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vancouverpublictransit.wordpress.com/?p=40#comment-8</guid>
		<description>So where in http://www.save16th.com/ does it say that Dunbar residents are involved in the website or opposition?? 

Save 16th is neither a Dunbar website nor a Dunbar initiative. Dunbar already has a bus that travels along most of Dunbar&#039;s 16th Avenue, the #25 bus. So how can Dunbar residents complain about a &quot;new service&quot; when a comparable route has been there for years!

The TRUTH: a Shaughnessy Residents Association asked if we would relay message opposed to the 16th Avenue Bus Service through the DRA&#039;s Neighbours list serve. We did. You may not believe it but every response afterwards supported the new route.

Please amend your Blog so it&#039;s accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So where in <a href="http://www.save16th.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.save16th.com/</a> does it say that Dunbar residents are involved in the website or opposition?? </p>
<p>Save 16th is neither a Dunbar website nor a Dunbar initiative. Dunbar already has a bus that travels along most of Dunbar&#8217;s 16th Avenue, the #25 bus. So how can Dunbar residents complain about a &#8220;new service&#8221; when a comparable route has been there for years!</p>
<p>The TRUTH: a Shaughnessy Residents Association asked if we would relay message opposed to the 16th Avenue Bus Service through the DRA&#8217;s Neighbours list serve. We did. You may not believe it but every response afterwards supported the new route.</p>
<p>Please amend your Blog so it&#8217;s accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
